Sherlock 2.3, Silly theory
Jan. 21st, 2012 11:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
aclararok, its been bothering me.
Mr.Moffat say that we all missed something important in the last ep. and I had full intention of not obsessing over it (yeah, did't work) and its been bothering me since the beginning that from one moment to the other Sherlock became a celebrity, a proper one, with media coverage and thank you press conferences which I must say is not in his personality. We did see him trying to cover his face and saying how he was a PI and so media publicity was the last thing he needed. So him, taking big cases and allowing press and publicity...it just dosen't make sense. So I'm thinking this was part of the bait. The other part was Mycroft loose tongue, because we all know that Mycroft doesn't do anything with out having all the bases covered.
So, this is my Theory:
After the Belgravia incident Mycroft needs to dispose of Moriarty and Sherlock is the perfect bait. So they give Moriarty ammunition and opportunity to burn Sherlock by 1. making him a celebrity and so in the public eye and 2. giving Moriarty a full load of truth about Sherlocks life. This means that after they just need to sit and wait for Moriarty to make his move. So it was all planed from the start, except maybe, Sherlock's dead. Since the whole sentiment and friendship was probably not accounted for and they did not expected for Moriarty to tread the life of Mrs Hudson and Lestrade.
There are things that it seems Moiriarty didn't had in to consideration. 1. Mycroft and Sherlock relationship is probably better than they show to the world. 2. Sherlock counts with more friends besides the obvious three and 3. Sherlock has practice making people look dead and disappear.
so yeah, this is me trying to not obsess over a tv series when I have to finish lab work and write my PhD thesis.
A.
Mr.Moffat say that we all missed something important in the last ep. and I had full intention of not obsessing over it (yeah, did't work) and its been bothering me since the beginning that from one moment to the other Sherlock became a celebrity, a proper one, with media coverage and thank you press conferences which I must say is not in his personality. We did see him trying to cover his face and saying how he was a PI and so media publicity was the last thing he needed. So him, taking big cases and allowing press and publicity...it just dosen't make sense. So I'm thinking this was part of the bait. The other part was Mycroft loose tongue, because we all know that Mycroft doesn't do anything with out having all the bases covered.
So, this is my Theory:
After the Belgravia incident Mycroft needs to dispose of Moriarty and Sherlock is the perfect bait. So they give Moriarty ammunition and opportunity to burn Sherlock by 1. making him a celebrity and so in the public eye and 2. giving Moriarty a full load of truth about Sherlocks life. This means that after they just need to sit and wait for Moriarty to make his move. So it was all planed from the start, except maybe, Sherlock's dead. Since the whole sentiment and friendship was probably not accounted for and they did not expected for Moriarty to tread the life of Mrs Hudson and Lestrade.
There are things that it seems Moiriarty didn't had in to consideration. 1. Mycroft and Sherlock relationship is probably better than they show to the world. 2. Sherlock counts with more friends besides the obvious three and 3. Sherlock has practice making people look dead and disappear.
so yeah, this is me trying to not obsess over a tv series when I have to finish lab work and write my PhD thesis.
A.
